|
Title: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Ddude The Insane on January 04, 2010, 04:59:36 pm I'm looking at the Top 10 Stickers list right now and not believing what I see:
1.dt 2.craZRacrXtreme 3.Bugefun 4.PohatuKai 5.nottoold 6.Sim533 7.Da_Legobuilder 8.landolin 9.timposter 10.Matoro119 How the HECK did dt top CRX? EDIT: Link (http://mln.lego.com/en-us/network/sticker.aspx) Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Magical Girl Mimi on January 04, 2010, 05:01:47 pm ... Dupers are at it again. Anyone up for a click spree?
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Jedi Man Jdg on January 05, 2010, 07:43:50 am Well, CRX is in the top ten still right now. O_O ATM, Blade is in the top ten stikcker.
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Master X: Neo Black on January 05, 2010, 07:59:14 am Lets take him down! MWAHAHAHHAA
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Magical Girl Mimi on January 05, 2010, 12:57:37 pm 0_o I'm in the top ten? While that's awesome, if I am, that's not good, because that means that something's wrong with the top ten...
/EDIT: ... Oh, this can't be good. CRX isn't featured in anything at this moment. Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Sim533 on January 05, 2010, 01:05:26 pm Chase7007 is the biggest problem!
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Magical Girl Mimi on January 05, 2010, 01:07:38 pm What are we supposed to do though? I highly doubt LEGO will take action, even though it's worth a try... But we need to click CRX's sticker module now.
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: MÆLXTRØM on January 07, 2010, 08:58:29 pm I've seen dt ahead of me a few times. He only passes me when he's duping.
We know he dupes because of communications with Pando. Back when Tim was number two in the sticker top 10 I would take down my mod so he could be number one, and then dt would immediately start duping and pass him. It was infuriating. Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: B~T on January 07, 2010, 09:05:07 pm I checked on the "tewd" dupes, and they were gone...
He must've deleted them... Oh well. Once a duper, always a duper, since if you try to abstain from duping, you somehow end up doing it again. Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: MsRowdyRedhead on January 07, 2010, 09:09:04 pm well, once people get away with duping, they come to believe it is ok to do it.. and when a lot of people do it it gets easier.
Takes all the joy out of things tho. Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Legodac on January 07, 2010, 10:59:24 pm You must understand, what we don't understand, Legos top ten is a program designed to make everyone fit.
If someone gets a brickload of clicks on a certain module, they may appear in the top ten pages, even though we all know CRX has the most. You're arguing with a computer program, one which isn't likely to change any time soon. Hey, if it were'nt for the dupers, I'd be there most of the time, I don't like them either. But it's not a problem, it's a situation we must deal with, because Lego is unwilling. Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Plotkin on January 07, 2010, 11:36:32 pm Due to the fact that I only harvest my MLN account about every week, there are alot of clicks pt on it, or atleast a good amount. Not as many as some other people, but you get my point. So, for some reason, if I get on and harvest, it decides to put me in the top ten list of something. Idk why, since I obviously dont have that many clicks. But as I stated like a year ago, the top ten is probably based on a formula or rules which would be impossible to guess
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Legodac on January 08, 2010, 12:06:35 am I hear an echo, that's right buddy, impossible to guess, but perhaps not. ???
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Ddude The Insane on January 08, 2010, 09:48:19 am Wait a minute....
WAIT A MINUTE... What if clicks are only recorded to the Top Ten based on the items you harvest from the module? Like, if I have 1000 clicks on my Tree Module, and Legodac has 100 clicks on his tree module, but I've harvested 100 bricks and he's only harvested 50? Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Magical Girl Mimi on January 08, 2010, 11:11:55 am Legodac: But it is a problem. This is a terms of service breach, fair and simple.
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Ddude The Insane on January 08, 2010, 11:35:57 am O_o Now dt isn't even in the Top 10.
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: MÆLXTRØM on January 08, 2010, 02:23:45 pm Wait a minute.... I've harvested 12,000 elemental water from my sticker mod. Anyone have more than that? =P Although he logically could by duping but that would be the most tedious job ever.WAIT A MINUTE... What if clicks are only recorded to the Top Ten based on the items you harvest from the module? Like, if I have 1000 clicks on my Tree Module, and Legodac has 100 clicks on his tree module, but I've harvested 100 bricks and he's only harvested 50? Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: MsRowdyRedhead on January 08, 2010, 02:26:27 pm I have no idea how many Earth I have harvested, I give so much of it away. How do you keep count??
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: MÆLXTRØM on January 08, 2010, 02:37:31 pm Haha I didn't even think about the fact that I've sold/given a lot of it away, that's just what I have left. I sold a lot of that stuff back when I had a shop.... In that case I have no idea. :P I'd have over 500,000 of them if there weren't harvest limits. -_-
Anyway, I used to think it was whenever I harvested that I would pop back on the top 10s, but I'm on there a lot when I'm not harvesting. I think it's more like when you get clicked you go back on. Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Plotkin on January 08, 2010, 02:51:29 pm Idk. I have been near the same spot since forever. Im still not to 300K yet
Title: Re: ...This could be a problem. Post by: Tommy_60 on January 08, 2010, 03:36:46 pm Yesterday, I was #7 in the top 10 gallery, but 5 minutes later, I wasn't on the list, but the people who were behind were still there!
|