Ok seriously,are you trying to use your debating skills to make this hard for me? If so,mission accomplished. I would respond,but you'll just find SOME WAY to win this arguement. Let me just comment about a few of your points-
So you're saying that as long as a game has good graphics, the plotline and functionality of the game don't matter? You're saying that nothing else matters except how good the graphics are, and if they suck, then it's bad? Entire brands and franchises have tried to use that mindset in making their games, and have crashed and burned horribly. And honestly, that's to say that all games before the games of today sucked, because their graphics are nothing compared to today's. Heck, give me an 8-bit game, so long as it has good plotline and functionality. I couldn't care less about how a game looks. That's an aesthetic part of the game. It's not as important. It's like saying that there are some really nice people in the world, but if they're ugly, you wouldn't date them. It's a bad mindset to use.
I am in no way saying that the graphics are the only important thing. I am just simply expressing my opinion that a game is made better when it has graphics that are lifelike. In fact,i love a game with a good plot. Look at Paper Mario. That game had subpar graphics,and i loved it.
*Sigh*...Because ddude started dissing this new game, as well as Nintendo and WiiWare titles in general.
I did NOT diss this game. I just siad it didn't make much of a first impression on me.
