Even More News About LRC

[Chicken Lord]

@OB1. It's not my fault took is in past tense, I just copied it(and they won't be using took until May 12, 2100) XD!

2.Of course it's the week of, if it was the day of, lego would be doing there job, plus it probably won't even be the week of

3. Flying cows, this is taking long

@MSRR, 1.We are not your children, let me remember so you can not talk to us like that
2.It is free, I agree, but they should be a little responsible

[MsRowdyRedhead]

What??
Quitchawhinin is one of the CPU's... which you should know if you did a little racing..

[Magical Girl Mimi]

CL: I mean that it was written like that on the actual message, so why would they be using took if it wasn't coming out very soon?

And the message said the week, not the exact day, so it could be any time this week, we only assumed it'd be today.

[Saturn2.0]

@MsRR: Well, yes they did use a ton of cash to develop it, but it costs us time and waiting too.

-Also, quitchawhining is a cheating loser.
-Well, it is 11-5-09, 6:45 central time zone (what's in the middle is the best ), and it says, "you do not have access to this game" .

[Chicken Lord]

@MSRR Yes but you were still talking to us, right?  Or are you talkin to quitchawinin?
@OB  The way it's looking now, if LRC is released this week it will be on a Sunday, except they never release anything on a Sunday, so it will be released on a Monday. 

[Legodac]

Do not forget the game is FREE to us, but it cost them a LOT of money to develop. So everybody quitchawhinin and THANK the staff at LEGO.

WRONG, we paid for the game, hello

[MsRowdyRedhead]

Do not forget the game is FREE to us, but it cost them a LOT of money to develop. So everybody quitchawhinin and THANK the staff at LEGO.

WRONG, we paid for the game, hello

UHM.. it may be the way LEGO spends their advertising budget, but it is a dang sight more than most toy manufacturers give us, so YAH it is free... there is no direct cost to play, and kids who have never bought a brick in their life can still play for free!

[Ddude The Insane]

MsRR makes a good point.

[lionytai]

@msrr: if they never bought a brick, how would they know lego.com? It is possible that their friends told them, but they will tell their parents to buy lego toys for them for presents. If they are not interested, why would they go to Lego.com? Maybe the parents don't have enough money, but if they don't have the money, how do they have internet access, or even computers?

[Magical Girl Mimi]

@msrr: if they never bought a brick, how would they know lego.com? It is possible that their friends told them, but they will tell their parents to buy lego toys for them for presents. If they are not interested, why would they go to Lego.com? Maybe the parents don't have enough money, but if they don't have the money, how do they have internet access, or even computers?

Libraries, school, that kind of stuff?

[MsRowdyRedhead]

@msrr: if they never bought a brick, how would they know lego.com? It is possible that their friends told them, but they will tell their parents to buy lego toys for them for presents. If they are not interested, why would they go to Lego.com? Maybe the parents don't have enough money, but if they don't have the money, how do they have internet access, or even computers?

Kids in preschools get introduced to LEGO in school. Also many daycares and community centers.  What difference does it make, the game is still FREE to all.

[Chicken Lord]

I get it, the LRC creators decided to make us pay in overdue days! What a form of currency! XD

[Saturn2.0]

Exactly, at least it doesn't get anymore complicating than spending extr-AH days.

[Magical Girl Mimi]

Take a wild guess.

Oh, and I just heard from the Powers that be that the game will not be able to launch this week.  I am sorry.  But at least that gives us time to open establish the rules.

Something tells me it's a combo of the HQ rules and the fact that there's a debate on whether to reset or not in that other topic >_>

[MÆLXTRØM]

I don't know why it's such a debate, they should be able to figure out the people that want it to stay are selfish, and the people who want it to reset are thinking about fairness for new players (as well as the ability to switch teams).

[Magical Girl Mimi]

True, but some people are saying it isn't fair because they worked hard to get that, and you know what happened the last time they tried to make everything fair for everyone >_>

[Chicken Lord]

Something really strange happened when I was on LRC.  When I clicked on the license stats(I'm in Class D) for a split second the the checklist changed, to something really bizarre,  The only things I could I identify was : Tell Me a Joke and something about a Chicken Wing(not kidding), then it changed back.  It worked a couple times after then stopped.

[Kritzelei]

That's... strange. Very strange. Chicken Wings? Are LEGO making glitches to keep LRC in Beta for longer?
TBD

[Magical Girl Mimi]

I dunno...

0_o What's freaky is I just randomly found CL right after he said that. xD

[MsRowdyRedhead]

Take a wild guess.

Oh, and I just heard from the Powers that be that the game will not be able to launch this week.  I am sorry.  But at least that gives us time to open establish the rules.

Something tells me it's a combo of the HQ rules and the fact that there's a debate on whether to reset or not in that other topic >_>

I am for reset..
here's what I posted...

Re: GIVE US A CHOICE!  Replies : 246   Views: 0 
 Neo_Blademan_Seed_Cross wrote:
LEGO, please reset the game.

Hey, we started from class E too!  Why can't they just race like we did and get on the high scores list themselves?  Besides, in your opinion it sounds like you would want to reset the game if one of the beta testers just got their mail from Pedalman Wheelie today.  That one beta tester would see people like good-guy and yourself up there on the high-scores list with over 500000 points!  Why can't we just have a choice?

Because everyone would just choose to keep their stats more than likely. And it's because a lot of those people raced non-stop a lot. Plus, the people already on the high scores could just race to the weekly limit, and keep their top spot. It doesn't really seem that fair to the new players.
===================================

As one of the people ON the high score list, and one of only two to reach 'World Class Racer" (1) I say RESET please. I would like to be fair to everyone, and I don't mind doing it over. In addition, it would be nice to have a "first race" again.
A level playing field would be great, and I may want to change teams.
Some of those in the top players list got there by cherry picking..that is niot accepting races and choosing to race only those they could win with significant advantage. You can tell them by the 100% stats.

Thank You.  

and

Re: RULES SUGGESTIONS  Replies : 43   Views: 0 
 Neo_Blademan_Seed_Cross wrote:

These are great suggestions so far and a lot of you have brought up some really good points.  Thank you!  Thank you! 
But I just want you all to know that I can't take all the credit for these rules.  They were adapted from a list of the Star Wars Rules. 

Anyhoo-I will read thru and complete an official list soon.

Oh, and I just heard from the Powers that be that the game will not be able to launch this week.  I am sorry.  But at least that gives us time to open establish the rules.

Can someone post the team names?
I think we can just open the exsisting HQ instead of start new ones, don't you? 



Just a note about that last one... Some of the teams have already had their teams settled, and they're different from the topic creators. If you re-open the HQs instead, then that progress shouldn't just be tossed to have it return to the stable teams' topic creators.

=================================

I agree.. I lot of work has been done on some of the teams to resolve leadership issues and build a strong foundation.
Here's a newsflash: It doesn't matter who an external source says is in charge of a team. Leaders emerge by acting like leaders. Not bosses.
Most arguements on LMB outside of trades revolve around who is leader, who is in charge, who is boss.
I think the point of a team is to learn to work together and help each other reach a goal.   It doen't matter who the leader is, it matters who LEADS. There is a difference. 

Now we wait and see....